|
|
I totally agree with Gooseberry, especially since if we look at the "rules", we can read the following thing: "The sooner your fruits disappear, the higher your score"!!!!!
Look for the error.
|
|
|
I noticed that the points were calculated without taking into account the success or not of the Round, that's not fair, you should get a bonus when you empty the board.
In fact, when there is only one package of identical fruits left, he only offered us lots of 3 identical fruits (fortunately!). At that moment, to increase our score, all we have to do is throw the packets offered further away until the last shot, so we increase our score.
ex: I almost emptied my tray and I have 9 shots left and only 9 oranges, I throw 8 packets of oranges away from those on the tray and keep, of course, the last one to eliminate my remaining oranges. In total I increased my score by 50%.
That's not strategic gambling, so the spice of the game is no longer there!
The score seems complex to me. Points are accumulated according to the number of fruits slaughtered and the points have a coefficient. The more fruits that are simultaneously slaughtered, the higher the coefficient. It's better to bring down 30 fruits at once than 15 in two.
This is what I found in their calculation, but above all it is unfair because success does not change the score.
|
|
|
I don't have the answer, especially since I've always wondered how it's possible to win more madpoints with a losing Round but a high score than if you empty the board quickly and without making a great score...
especially be careful not to blow up too many balls at the first shot, it's bad for the rest
|
